Arkansas Insurance Adjuster Practice Exam

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

Why were Theresa's efforts to get flood damage covered unsuccessful?

Theresa's coinsurance is 80%

Theresa should have demanded full payment and talked her way down to half

her adjuster is an extremely effective negotiator

the policy's coverage is non-negotiable

Upon reviewing the options, it is clear that the first three choices do not directly address the reason for Theresa's unsuccessful attempts to get her flood damage covered. Choice A discusses Theresa's coinsurance percentage, which ultimately has no impact on whether or not her damage will be covered. Choice B suggests that Theresa should have argued for full payment, a tactic that is not likely to make a difference in the outcome. Choice C implies that Theresa's adjuster was skilled at negotiating, but this is also not a relevant factor in determining coverage for flood damage. Therefore, choice D is the correct answer as it directly states that the policy's coverage is non-negotiable, which is the most likely reason for Theresa's unsuccessful efforts.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next Question

Report this question

Download Arkansas Insurance Adjuster Practice Exam PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy